select
|

Common property maintenance versus improvement and their authorisation

(Article by Anton Kelly)
 
As with some other aspects of sectional title scheme management, the distinction between maintenance of and improvement to the common property is not always crystal clear.

A rule of thumb could be: maintenance keeps the common property in its original state of appearance and functionality, while improvements add to or upgrade it in some way. The arguable point could be when some part of the common property reaches the end of its functional life and it makes more sense to replace it with something perhaps more modern, efficient and economical yet different. Is that maintenance or an improvement? The answer to this question is important because maintenance and improvements are authorised differently.

Maintenance of the common property, especially in schemes that have been running for a few years, should hold no surprises. The regular items are included in the budget and are dealt with routinely, long term items are also included in the budget and effectively saved for. There should also be a contingency amount in the budget that will cater for any maintenance item that could not be foreseen. The trustees normally have the discretion to authorise spending on these items.

Improvements to the common property, on the other hand, are not routine. The common property of a scheme is owned by all the owners in undivided shares. One of the basic principles of co-ownership, that all owners must agree to any significant change to their property, has been codified but made slightly less demanding in the prescribed rules.

The prescribed rules distinguish between luxurious and non-luxurious improvements but do not suggest any criteria for their definition. What makes an improvement luxurious or not will therefore depend on the individual scheme and will probably change from time to time, depending on the opinions of the individuals that own the units and the financial state of the scheme. A rule of thumb that can be applied to this quandary is, an improvement that is a “must have” is likely to be non-luxurious but one that is a “nice to have” is probably luxurious.

This uncertainty is unfortunate because while a non-luxurious improvement must almost always be authorised by a special resolution of the body corporate, a difficult thing to achieve, authorising a luxurious improvement always requires a unanimous resolution, an exceptionally difficult thing to achieve.

The trustees are entitled to suggest a non-luxurious improvement but there is a specified procedure that must be followed to get the authorisation. The owners must be notified of the trustees’ suggestion, must be fully informed of the financial implications and, if any owner requests a meeting to discuss the improvement, a meeting must be held and the special resolution taken at the meeting. If the resolution is not taken, the improvement cannot be made. There are two implications to this provision. The first is that if no owner requests a meeting within the required thirty day notice period, the meeting need not be held and no special resolution is required to authorise that particular improvement. The second is that this is one special resolution that must be taken at a meeting and cannot be taken by round robin.


  Comment on this Article

  Please login to post comments

Post to my facebook wall
  
2000
Characters remaining


    Latest Property News
    • 19 Jan 2018
      Extending from Randfontein in the west to Roodepoort in the east and including the towns of Krugersdorp and Magaliesburg, the West Rand has a plethora of property available to residents who choose to make this unique area their home.
    • 19 Jan 2018
      When it comes to financial planning, doing the work to ensure you’re prepared for unexpected emergencies is just as important as ticking off your other goals and New Year’s resolutions. The beginning of the year is also the perfect time to review your various insurance policies.
    • 19 Jan 2018
      No surprises at the first Monetary Policy Committee of 2018, as Reserve Bank Governor, Lesetja Kganyago, announced that the interest rates would stay at their current levels.
    • 18 Jan 2018
      The Southern Suburbs make up some of the most popular residential areas in Cape Town, comprising charming groups of suburbs which lie to the south-east of the slopes of Table Mountain. It is seen as the city's most expensive residential neighbourhoods with a choice of various private schools, upmarket eateries, wine estates, beautiful homes and trendy apartments.
    • 18 Jan 2018
      New year, new goals! If you’ve resolved to purchase your first property in 2018, then this 6-step guide from the Rawson Property Group is a must-read. It will help you navigate and simplify what is often be seen as a confusing process of buying your first home – right from the house-hunt to the house-warming.
    • 17 Jan 2018
      While the current property market may still favour buyers, it doesn’t mean that they shouldn’t be well prepared before putting in an offer to purchase.
    • 17 Jan 2018
      Lightstone lists Blair Atholl as the most expensive suburb with an average house price of R11.2 million, followed by Westcliff (R10.5 million), Dunkeld (R9.3 million), Sandhurst (R9.1 million) and Inanda (R7.2 million).
    • 17 Jan 2018
      As it currently stands, there are four main ways in which a home can be bought in South Africa, says Adrian Goslett, Regional Director and CEO of RE/MAX of Southern Africa, who adds that deciding in which legal entity to purchase the property is not a decision that should be entered into lightly, as each has its pros and cons.
        
    X
    Subscribe to the MyProperty Newsletter

    Name  
    Last Name  
    Email Address  
    Email Frequency
    select
    X
    Share this Page

       
    For Sale Property
    Rental Property
    More Options
    About
    Connect with us
    FEEDBACK