select
|

Valuations blow for 10 000 Johannesburg property owners

Nearly 10 000 property owners received a massive shock when they learnt that their successful objections to the inflated valuations of their properties in the General Property Valuation Roll in 2008 were negated by the Valuation Appeal Board at hearings where they were not present or represented.

At these hearings, the original, higher valuations were restored, and in some cases increased.
The compulsory review of valuations is done in terms of the Municipal Property Rates Act, and must take place if the successful objection to the original valuation results in a decrease in the valuation of more than 10 percent.

The length of time it took the board to complete all the reviews meant that some owners were informed only recently of these higher outcomes.

Property owners who believed their objections were successful were not advised of the date of the board's hearings and were not asked to be present.

The shock was compounded by huge backdated accounts for rates and, to add insult to injury, the account was payable immediately.

The DA is taking the matter up with the public protector, claiming that there are clear provisions in the constitution and the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act that require administrative action that is reasonable and procedurally fair.

John Mendelsohn, the DA spokesman for rates and valuations, has asked the public protector to investigate the constitutionality of the practice of compulsory reviews in the owner's absence, as well as the lack of proper record keeping by the board.

The request, he says, is timely, because when compiling the first of two Supplementary Valuation Rolls for 2012, it resulted in 14 000 objections being submitted.

In addition, the council has started the compilation of a new General Valuation Roll, affecting more than 1 million properties, which becomes effective on July 1 next year.

"Both these exercises will undoubtedly generate many more compulsory reviews that will come before the board for adjudication. The Valuations Appeal Board unfairly hears compulsory reviews of property valuations behind closed doors, in the property owner's absence, and without giving the owner notice of the date of the hearing. The owner is only notified of the outcome of the hearing," he said.

If a previously successful objection to a property valuation was negated by the board, restoring the original and higher valuation, it resulted in a huge rates increase and a bill backdated to the date of the original valuation, he said.

The only remedy open to the aggrieved owners is to apply to the High Court, at their own cost, for a review. Apart from the steep cost of litigating in the High Court, said Mendelsohn, when it came to having to provide the court with a record of the proceedings of the board, as required by the court rules, the owner would learn that the board kept no full record of the proceedings, only a record of the outcome.

"That means there is no record of how the decision was arrived at, which the court requires," he said.

Jane Smith of Bryanston is one of the city's victims. Her property was revalued from R1.9 million to R2.9m in 2008. Her objection was upheld.

In about March this year, she got a backdated account for R20 000, only to find that the valuation of her property was back at R2.9m.

"We had no idea the valuation was going to be reviewed. We were neither invited, nor told about it - there was no communication whatsoever," she said.

Smith said she had to sign a payment agreement with the city to pay off the arrears over three years.

Denis Hunt, a DA councillor, had a similar experience.

In 2008, his Sandton property was valued at R3.3m. He objected, and it was revalued at R1.8m, which the city accepted. The city then appealed against its own valuation without informing him and the appeal board revalued the property at R2.4m.

Hunt again tried to object, with no outcome, he said.

Then suddenly this year the property's listing appeared on the supplementary valuation roll at R3.8m, even higher than the first valuation. He again objected, with no result.

"I believe this is a deliberate campaign to target residents in the upper-income brackets," he said.
The City of Johannesburg didn't respond to several requests for comment.

(The Star)


  Comment on this Article

  Please login to post comments

Post to my facebook wall
  
2000
Characters remaining


    Latest Property News
    • 21 Jun 2018
      Anyone who’s ever been involved in a building project that’s gone wrong will appreciate the importance of adequate insurance cover in the construction industry.
    • 21 Jun 2018
      A recent news story about a blind tenant caught in a legal battle with his body corporate over letters and notices he was unable to read and consequently comply with has raised the question: what are the legal obligations for landlords with disabled tenants?
    • 21 Jun 2018
      A trend that’s taken the world by storm in recent years is that of hygge (pronounced: hue-guh), a Danish concept that is about creating intimacy, connecting with loved ones and taking pleasure in small, ordinary things.
    • 20 Jun 2018
      Buying or selling real estate isn’t as easy as it is portrayed sometimes, especially if there is a death of a party during the transaction which can make it awkward, tricky and inconvenient.
    • 20 Jun 2018
      With interest rates remaining at historic lows and banks continuing to compete for mortgage finance business, first-time buyers with funds at their disposal are currently well-placed to gain that initial foothold on the property ladder, particularly in the light of the slightly lower growth rates currently experienced in residential property values.
    • 20 Jun 2018
      The average size of bond granted in SA has grown 7,7% in the past 12 months to R934 000, according to BetterBond, the country’s biggest bond originator.
    • 19 Jun 2018
      In the current market, letting out a property can be a good option as rental demand remains strong, especially in the northern suburbs of Johannesburg. This is according to Chris Renecle, MD of Renprop. However he says that before homeowners let their property out, there are five key points they should make sure are covered before they market the property for rent and sign any lease agreements.
    • 19 Jun 2018
      The Capetonian dream is to live by the ocean with the iconic mountain making an appearance somewhere in the horizon. But, that dream comes with a hefty price tag that many simply cannot afford. But, should you venture some kilometres out of the city centre, entirely new realms of beachside bliss await you …
        
    X
    Subscribe to the MyProperty Newsletter

    Name  
    Last Name  
    Email Address  
    Email Frequency
    select
    X
    Share this Page

       
    For Sale Property
    Rental Property
    More Options
    About
    Connect with us
    FEEDBACK