Real estate investment trusts (REITs) are subject to a special tax regime in SA

(Article by Ben Strauss, director in Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr's tax department)
Put simply, a REIT may deduct for income tax purposes distributions made to its shareholders. As a REIT by its nature distributes most of its net income to its investors, the REIT itself usually pays little or no income tax; instead, the shareholder pays income tax on the distributions received from the REIT.

The distribution, however, is only deductible by the REIT if it falls within the definition of ‘qualifying distribution’ in s25BB(1) of the Income Tax Act, No 58 of 1962 (Act). Notably, to fall under the definition the REIT must meet one of the following requirements (among others):

(a) at least 75% of the gross income of the company during its first year of assessment that the company qualifies as a REIT (or a controlled company in relation to the REIT) must consist of rental income; or

(b) in any other case, at least 75% of the gross income of a REIT or a controlled company in the preceding year of assessment must have consisted of rental income.

The term ‘rental income’ is defined in s25BB(1) of the Act.

(Note that the provisions in paragraph (a) above were amended recently with effect from 1 April 2013, the date that the new REIT taxation regime was introduced. Before the change, the provision stated that “at least 75% of the gross income received by or accrued to a REIT or a controlled company until the date of the declaration of that dividend consists of rental income where a REIT or a controlled company is incorporated, formed or established during that year of assessment”.)

The term ‘qualifying distribution’ was the subject matter of a recent ruling of the South African Revenue Service (SARS), Binding Private Ruling: BPR 218 dated 1 February 2016.

The facts of the ruling were these: The first financial year and first year of assessment of a newly incorporated local company (NewCo) ended on 30 June 2015. NewCo listed on the JSE shortly after 30 June 2015 after concluding an amalgamation transaction with a portfolio created as a collective investment scheme in property (CISP).

As from its listing, NewCo started trading as a corporate REIT.

The CISP, under the regulatory requirements pertaining to its industry, converted its business to a corporate structure which was housed in NewCo. The conversion became effective on 1 July 2015. It consisted of the transfer of the assets and liabilities of the CISP to NewCo in exchange for the CISP receiving shares or linked units in NewCo, on the basis that those shares or linked units were issued on behalf of the CISP to the unit holders. The CISP was thereafter voluntarily wound up. The conversion constituted an ‘amalgamation transaction’ under s44 of the Act.

Notably, NewCo conducted no business activities and earned no income before the conversion.

NewCo would make distributions for its year of assessment ending 30 June 2016, being its first year of earning rental income and its first year to be assessed as a REIT.

The distribution in respect of its 2016 year of assessment (to be determined with reference to its financial results for the financial year ending 30 June 2016) will only be made after 30 June 2016, once its financial results have been finalised, unless an interim distribution is made during the course of the 2016 year of assessment, in accordance with the manner in which REITs ordinarily make distributions.

SARS ruled that the provision in paragraph (a) cited above did not apply as the distribution would only be made after 30 June 2016. Instead, in establishing whether 75% of the gross income of NewCo consists of ‘rental income’, in order for it to make a ‘qualifying distribution’ for its year of assessment ending 30 June 2016 - that is, its first year of assessment as a REIT - the applicable year of assessment to consider will be the year of assessment in which NewCo was incorporated, which ended on 30 June 2015. Accordingly, one must have regard to paragraph (b) cited above.

However, on the facts of the ruling, NewCo had no ‘rental income’ in its year of assessment ending on 30 June 2015. Accordingly, NewCo would not have been making a ‘qualifying distribution’ in its 2016 year of assessment.

However, SARS nevertheless ruled that NewCo will comply with the provisions of paragraph (b) and that NewCo would be making a ‘qualifying distribution’ in respect of the 2016 year of assessment (provided that all the other requirements of the definition are met).

The ruling shows that newly formed REITs must take great care at the time of their formation and listing to ensure that the distributions they make after their formation do in fact constitute ‘qualifying distributions’.

  Comment on this Article

  Please login to post comments

Post to my facebook wall
Characters remaining

    Latest Property News
    • 22 Feb 2018
      An excellent credit score is one of the most priceless assets a potential home buyer can have. This tool has the power to secure favorable mortgage and refinancing rate, influencing everything from the size of the loan repayment to the interest rate on the home loan.
    • 22 Feb 2018
      What do you do if you love your home’s location and the area, but the home no longer fits your growing family’s needs? Do you stay and renovate your existing home or find a home that meets your developing criteria?
    • 22 Feb 2018
      While every owner wants to sell their property at the best possible price, overpricing a home can be the kiss of death for a sale.
    • 21 Feb 2018
      Given the hand they were dealt, government has performed a delicate balancing act which it is hoped will serve to reignite confidence in investment in South Africa, regain our global credibility and satisfy the credit ratings agencies, says Dr Andrew Golding, chief executive of the Pam Golding Property group.
    • 21 Feb 2018
      The real estate mantra, ‘location, location, location’ remains a strong market influence regardless of the prevailing economy, with suburbs like Rondebosch enjoying the buffering benefit of being ideally situated.
    • 21 Feb 2018
      These days most buyers are using online property portals like Private Property when house hunting due to the convenience, up to date information and variety on offer. “The property portals have revolutionised the way buyers shop, but they do need to be cautious – viewing photos online is no replacement for viewing the property in person,” says Bruce Swain, CEO of Leapfrog Property Group.
    • 20 Feb 2018
      Owning a home is a milestone that most South Africans aspire to. Becoming a homeowner is a step towards growing personal wealth and owning an asset that appreciates in value over time, provided of course that the correct principles are applied during the buying stage of the process, says Adrian Goslett, Regional Director and CEO of RE/MAX of Southern Africa.
    • 20 Feb 2018
      The suburb of Greenstone in Johannesburg east came to be over the last two decades. “In the beginning, it was literally just a hill with not so much as a shopping centre,” says Michael Levy, Property Consultant at Jawitz Properties Bedfordview. Today it has plenty shopping facilities and is fully built, boasting high-density, upmarket housing and residential estates, though still has a few pockets poised for commercial development.
    Subscribe to the MyProperty Newsletter

    Last Name  
    Email Address  
    Email Frequency
    Share this Page

    For Sale Property
    Rental Property
    More Options
    Connect with us