select
|

Residents' Pet Hate: Body Corporate Rules

(Article By Ramodikwe Masemola, Candidate Attorney, overseen by  Muhammad Ziyaad Gattoo, Director, Real Estate, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr)

If there was ever a dog that could win a case on looks alone, Theodore was that dog. Only a fine canine would motivate a high court judge to open his judgment by remarking on the "rather striking Saint Bernard".

The case of Abraham and Another v Mount Edgecombe Country Club Estate Management Association Two (RF) (NPC) (7124/12) [2014] ZAKZDHC 36, turned on whether or not Theodore could remain on the prestigious Durban estate, Mount Edgecombe. Shortly after acknowledging the dapper Theodore, Olsen J set the record straight, emphasising that the case was not about the dog but, rather, about the rules we humans voluntarily agree to and those who are elected to enforce those rules. The Mount Edgecombe case serves as a warning to all present and future sectional title dwellers to take heed of the rules which govern their schemes.  

In 2002, Theodore's owners – a mother and son – moved into the Mount Edgecombe Estate and, like the owners before them, agreed to be bound by the rules and decisions of the scheme's management association. One of these rules would come back to bite them; rule 5, entitled "Pet Control," stated the following:

"5.1.1 Written permission must first be obtained from [the respondent] before a dog may be brought onto the Estate. This permission will not be unreasonably withheld provided compliance with the following rules is observed:

5.1.2 …

5.1.3 Dogs must be small and not be of a known aggressive breed. In regard to the size of dogs, they should be of a breed which will not exceed 20 kg when fully grown.”


Acting in contravention of this rule, the dog owners brought the young St Bernard onto the property, only later making an application to the management association for permission to do so. For interest's sake, the dog's weight was estimated at 70 kilograms when fully grown so it is safe to say that Theodore surpassed the 20 kilogram threshold by some margin. The management association denied the requested permission, which led to the dispute.

During the case, Theodore's owners principal argument was that, upon a proper construction of the rule, the directors of the management association had a discretion to grant the permission. According to Theodore's owners, the directors, acting on behalf of the estate, were under the mistaken impression that they had no such discretion and acted on that basis. Thus, Theodore's owners called for the estate's decision to be set aside with a direction that they reconsider the matter using their discretion.

To bolster their argument, Theodore's owners referred to a number of cases, one of which was Body Corporate of the Laguna Ridge Scheme N.O. 152/1987 v Dorse 1999 (2) SA 512 (D). The facts of the Laguna Ridge case were as follows: a resident kept a miniature Yorkshire Terrier dog in a sectional title unit despite the trustees refusing to grant the resident permission to do so. The relevant rules provided that no animals or pets could be kept in the building without the express written permission of the trustees. No criteria for applying these rules was laid down. The court held that each request for permission to keep an animal had to be considered on its own merits and facts. The restriction on keeping of animals was designed to avoid the causing of a nuisance to the other occupants in the building. Despite this underlying policy, the trustees refused permission even though the woman’s dog did not bark and was never allowed to roam on the common property. Accordingly, the court found that the trustees had not adequately applied their minds to the matter, overruling the trustees’ decision.

Olsen J was quick to distinguish the Laguna Ridge case, from the Mount Edgecombe case, pointing out that in the latter set of facts, "the rule generated the decision." In other words – as the court put it - the estate had no discretion to register a non-aggressive breed of dog which exceeds the 20 kilogram limit when fully grown, save for the truly exceptional case of guide dogs for blind people. The court pointed out that Theodore's owners had not provided any extraordinary reason that would warrant the application of the narrow discretion.

The court held that regardless of opinions as to the invasiveness of certain rules, the reality is that the rules were agreed upon by the contracting parties in order to maintain a structure within which residents felt secure about their environment, the conduct reasonably expected of their neighbours and the estate's ability to enforcement its authority.

When purchasing property in a sectional title scheme, we must be aware that we are contractually agreeing to abide by the rules applying to that scheme. While some may be tempted to ask for forgiveness rather than permission – bringing their dogs onto an estate and hoping for the best – this rebellious attitude may lead to unnecessary heartache and, worse still, the eviction of beloved pets.


  Comment on this Article

  Please login to post comments

Post to my facebook wall
  
2000
Characters remaining


    Latest Property News
    • 20 Jun 2018
      Buying or selling real estate isn’t as easy as it is portrayed sometimes, especially if there is a death of a party during the transaction which can make it awkward, tricky and inconvenient.
    • 20 Jun 2018
      With interest rates remaining at historic lows and banks continuing to compete for mortgage finance business, first-time buyers with funds at their disposal are currently well-placed to gain that initial foothold on the property ladder, particularly in the light of the slightly lower growth rates currently experienced in residential property values.
    • 20 Jun 2018
      The average size of bond granted in SA has grown 7,7% in the past 12 months to R934 000, according to BetterBond, the country’s biggest bond originator.
    • 19 Jun 2018
      In the current market, letting out a property can be a good option as rental demand remains strong, especially in the northern suburbs of Johannesburg. This is according to Chris Renecle, MD of Renprop. However he says that before homeowners let their property out, there are five key points they should make sure are covered before they market the property for rent and sign any lease agreements.
    • 19 Jun 2018
      The Capetonian dream is to live by the ocean with the iconic mountain making an appearance somewhere in the horizon. But, that dream comes with a hefty price tag that many simply cannot afford. But, should you venture some kilometres out of the city centre, entirely new realms of beachside bliss await you …
    • 19 Jun 2018
      Douw Steyn, one of the richest men in the country, recently allowed a rare glimpse into his Fourways Palazzo when it was featured on the SABC lifestyle programme Top Billing - and it is beyond your wildest dreams!
    • 18 Jun 2018
      Many home sellers are motivated to appoint estate agents because they know that the agency will carry the costs of advertising and marketing their property.
    • 18 Jun 2018
      When a property is sold when it has a tenant in occupation, the questions often raised are: “What happens to the tenant if the landlord sells the property?”, and what rights the tenant will have with regards to cancelling the lease or enforcing it, says Sunell Afrika, rentals manager for SAProperty.com.
        
    X
    Subscribe to the MyProperty Newsletter

    Name  
    Last Name  
    Email Address  
    Email Frequency
    select
    X
    Share this Page

       
    For Sale Property
    Rental Property
    More Options
    About
    Connect with us
    FEEDBACK